Michigan

  Employment Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
February 06, 2012
Employment
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Employment Law News

 

New Legislation Protects Employees Participating In Union Activities

Protects against worker harassment, intimidation, or retribution for engaging in union activities

WASHINGTON -- In an effort to protect hundreds of thousands of employees who have faced harassment, intimidation, or retribution for engaging in union organizing activities, House Democrats today introduced the Employee Right to Choose Act. The bill simplifies workplace organizing by providing a simple, fair, direct method for workers to form unions by signing cards or petitions. The bill is a companion to one introduced this year by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

“Unfortunately, an aggressive assault on American workers, and the institutions that represent them, has dangerously eroded union-organizing rights, resulting in a steady decline in the percentage of Americans in labor unions. We must take action in order to preserve this fundamental right of all employees to organize and take collective action in the workplace,” said George Miller (D-CA), senior Democrat of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, who along with Tim Bishop (D-NY) introduced the bill. Altogether, the bill has 16 original cosponsors.

Today, an aggressive assault on workers faces many union organizers: almost one-third of organizing campaigns end in employers illegally firing union supporters; more than half of employers subject to such organizing campaigns threaten to shut down a workplace if the union succeeds; 80% of employers respond to employees’ efforts to form a union by hiring outside consultants; 92% of employers force employees to attend closed-door meetings where they are pressured not to join.

"The truth is, too many hard-working Americans are actively subjected to threats and intimidation when they try to assert their right to start or support a union at their workplace,” Miller said. The law today unfairly advantages employers. We are introducing this Act today to address this unfair advantage.”

The Employee Right to Choose Act closes to the gap between workers and employers by amending the National Labor Relations Act to replicate the “card check” system currently in Canada. The Act would:


Simplify Workplace Organizing. The bill provides a simple, fair, direct method for workers to form unions by signing cards or petitions.

Protect Workers Engaging in Organizing Activity. Under the current system, employees seeking union representation first sign a petition that is sent to the NLRB as evidence that sufficient interest exists to justify an election. Unfortunately, this document is often used to harass people who have signed it. Under the bill, employers would not have an opportunity to see the list of union supporters before certification takes place.

Limit Employers’ Abilities to Union-Bust. Under the current system, once the NLRB has certified employee interest in organization, the workplace must wait 60 days before participating in an election. Many employers currently utilize those two months to engage in antiunion activities, such as “mandatory” work sessions and harassment. This legislation would essentially close that window for employers.

Facilitate First Contract Negotiation. This legislation sets hard time limits by which parties must begin and complete their negotiation of the first contract after union certification. If the parties fail to meet those deadlines, the bill would authorize involvement of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Board and, if necessary, a third-party arbitrator to force a first contract between the new union and its employer. This would eradicate the delaying tactics often used by employers during contract negotiation.


Contact our Michigan Employment Lawyer Now.

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Second Injury Fund benefits may be available durring employment
However, after the first 450 weeks of benefits for total and permanent disability, wages from employment will be used to reduce your benefit amount. The reduction is based upon the percentage that your current earnings bear to those at the time of your being declared totally and permanently disabled.

 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Employment cases in Michigan and nationwide:

Eeoc Settles Sex Bias Suit Against Auto Dealer Jeff Wyler Eastgate, Inc. For $2.3 Million
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced today that it has resolved its lawsuit charging that Jeff Wyler Eastgate, Inc. an...
Read more >


Chief Justice For Administration And Management Appoints Honorable Lynda M. Connolly As New Chief Justice Of The District Court Department
 In announcing the appointment of Chief Justice Connolly, Chief Justice Mulligan said, “Judge Connolly is a highly intelligent, experienced ju...
Read more >


More Employment News >

 
 

Employment Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Readily Achievable

Definition:
Easily accomplishable and able to be carried out without much difficulty or expense. In determining whether an action is readily achievable, factors to be considered include nature and cost of the action, overall financial resources and the effect on expenses and resources, legitimate safety requirements, impact on the operation of a site and, if applicable, overall financial resources, size and type of operation of any parent corporation or entity.

Curb Cut

Definition:
Also called a curb ramp, it is a depression built into the curb of a sidewalk to permit passage by a wheelchair. The incline should not exceed a gradient of 1:12 and the flat surface width should be no less than 4 feet wide.

Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act

Definition:
Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §12111, et seq., prohibits discrimination in employment against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability. It also is unlawful under the Act for an employer to take retaliatory action against any individual for opposing employment practices made unlawful by the ADA or for filing a discrimination charge or for testifying or assisting or participating in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the ADA.

More Employment Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Employment Resources

 


Search Employment resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Employment Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Employment:

  • Collective Bargaining
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Unemployment Compensation
  • Pensions
  • Workplace Safety
  • Worker's Compensation

More Employment Topics >

Michigan Employment Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Employment attorney you should contact our Employment Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Adrian
  • Ann Arbor
  • Battle Creek
  • Bay City
  • Belleville
  • Canton
  • Clinton Township
  • Dearborn
  • Dearborn Heights
  • Detroit
  • East Lansing
  • Flint
  • Grand Blanc
  • Grand Rapids
  • Hamtramck
  • Highland Park
  • Holland
  • Howell
  • Jackson
  • Lansing
  • Lincoln Park
  • Livonia
  • Macomb
  • Mount Pleasant
  • Muskegon
  • Niles
  • Northville
  • Plymouth
  • Port Huron
  • Redford
  • Rochester
  • Roseville
  • Saginaw
  • Sterling Heights
  • Taylor
  • Traverse City
  • Trenton
  • Troy
  • Warren
  • Westland
  • Wyandotte
  • Ypsilanti
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Michigan Employment Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.